February 5, 2008
Maybe that’s a silly question, because these days it would be hard to find someone who didn’t think recycling was a good idea. Taking something made for one purpose and finding a way to reuse it or its materials for another purpose once its original purpose is fulfilled, well that just seems like common sense. In and of itself, it is efficient, and to do otherwise seems wasteful.
Continuing the line of thinking from my last post, where I suggest the idea that making sustainable choices is essentially considering the well-being of future generations, recycling seems to take on a bit of a nobler, higher purpose than merely being efficient. I have to confess that when I dump all our paper, cardboard, glass, and number-one-and-two plastics in the big blue recycling can the city provides for us, I’m not thinking to myself ‘This is something I do out of love for my kids and their kids.’ But you know, maybe I should. Because if I didn’t, and I just tossed everything in the big green can for trash, I’m basically contributing to the problem of waste management… eventually all that trash has to be dealt with by somebody, and an awful lot of the consequences wind up in the laps of our kids.
I’ve been reading a book called Sex God by Rob Bell. In it he talks about how disconnected we are from nature, how in our society we have so effectively air-conditioned ourselves out of the need to be outdoors that it is possible to go months without spending any appreciable time outside at all. I know, I live in Arizona during the summer. You’re considered crazy to be outside when it is 110 degrees Fahrenheit in the shade. Anyhoo, part of the disconnect finds its way into how we deal with our trash and the manner in which we satisfy our very basic human needs: shelter, water, food.
If you are reading this you’re probably the sort of person who actually thinks about where your trash goes. Maybe you even think about where your water comes from and how is it that it is safe to drink and will there be enough for everyone in the future. Maybe you even think about where your poop goes when you flush the toilet, and what happens to all the water we use to do the flushing.
You have to admit that there is something in our society that doesn’t really want to think deeply about these things. Maybe it’s denial, but maybe it’s just plain hard. I mean, do you really know how much electricity your air conditioner uses in one hour? Do you really know how much water is consumed to generate that electricity? Do you really know how much water it takes to generate enough electricity to power the air conditioners of two million people? Do you really know how much water it takes to flush all the poo for two million people in a year? Do you know how much water it takes to recover all that poopy water so it can be used for something else?
I don’t, but I know it’s a lot, and I know it’s more than we have. If we had enough, the mighty Colorado River would still be mighty all the way to the ocean, the Santa Cruz would have water in it year-round like it used to, and so would the San Pedro… which actually did run year-round until the last few years. But no more.
So maybe we ought to be asking ourselves these kinds of questions when we run our air conditioners and flush our toilets and leave the lights on in rooms we aren’t using. Maybe our kids are counting on us asking those questions.
February 6, 2008 at 6:28 am
What about the other two R’s. Reuse is my personal favorite. I love finding new uses for something that I thought about throwing away.
I know I’ve mentioned this here before (at least I think I have). but isn’t it Wendell Berry who talks about proxy’s? Maybe I read it somewhere else. Anyhoo (to borrow Ryan’s word) the basic idea is that most of our impact on the world, and even on other people is carried out by proxy, by other people that we pay to act for us. This allows us to do really nasty stuff, without having to acknowledge that we are doing it. It is one of the mechanisms our culture has developed to eliminate the concept of personal responsibility.
Also I think the short answer to all of your questions above is “a lot”
February 6, 2008 at 9:15 am
I’ve also heard about the ‘tyranny of small decisions’.
Say you live in a cabin by a large lake or river. When you think about it, the wastewater from your cabin really isn’t that much, and it would be mighty easy to discretely dump it in that large, conveniently-located body of water. After all, it really wouldn’t do much to such a large body of water, would it? It really wouldn’t have that much impact…
But imagine if there were a thousand cabins along the same shore and everyone else thinks the same way. Pretty soon that large body of water is no longer fit to swim in or drink from… and it’s mighty hard to clean up the mess.
February 6, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Yes, the summation of small decisions is important to think about.
I was thinking more though about the fact that others do things for us. For example…if you lived in that cabin by the lake, and you got your drinking water from the lake you might not throw your waste in it.
But what we do to get around that problem is we pay someone to come and take our waste, and throw it in the lake. What’s the point you may ask? It allows us to absolve ourselves. I can get upset about the drying of the Colorado, or the pollution of the mountain lake…and not feel responsible…while it is my water consumption, or waste production, or energy use that accomplished the destruction.
Using a proxy is a psychological coping mechanism that allows me to abuse the earth (or others) to accomplish my own ends without facing the real effects of my actions.
And this isn’t necessarily a conscious decision. I don’t go out every day thinking I want to hide my actions from myself. When I go to the grocery store, I don’t know what was required to produce the products I buy. And I don’t ask. And that is the protection that proxies offer.
hmmm
February 6, 2008 at 5:11 pm
That leads me to the question, what shall we do when our proxies are exposed and we begin to see the actual impact?
Take the flush toilet, the ultimate proxy.
Connected to a sanitary sewer or to a septic, the flush toilet requires taking drinking water and dumping poop in it, and then whisking it away for someone else to clean up… usually with toxic chemicals like chlorine bleach.
A composting toilet, on the other hand, safely converts what is otherwise a waste product into something useful and pollutes no water in the process (with either poo or bleach).
People are understandably uncomfortable with poo. The conventional flush toilet cleanly removes the discomfort from view and someone else ‘cleans and disinfects’ it; all we do is wipe down the bowl from time to time.
A composting toilet takes work and requires you to interact with your poo in a more involved fashion. You have to turn the drum or maintain a thermophilic compost pile. You can’t clean the unit with nasty chemicals like bleach because it kills off the bacteria God made to deal with your poo.
The consequences of the flush toilet is huge water usage, not just in flushing but also in running all the equipment to remove the poop in a treatment plant. The consequence of the composting toilet is, you have to deal with your poo. Personally.
Now, who wants to rip out their flush toilets and put in composting ones?
February 6, 2008 at 5:44 pm
I think that’s exactly what we need to ask. What happens when I do this. What are the consequences of my actions?
ANd I think you are right that we have a responsibility to act for ourselves insofar as we are able when those consequences are negaive